Book review: Winning, by Frank Dick

I am generally a sucker for recommendations by people I trust and I recently saw “Winning”, by Frank Dick (affiliate links: UK, US) recommended.  It’s pretty cheap on Amazon, so I ordered a copy and I wasn’t disappointed.

Frank will show you how to win

***

So it’s a book about winning?

Well, sort of.  It’s primarily about how to approach your own training and preparation for competition or success in meeting your goals.  However, it’s also a book about how to coach someone else to approach training and preparation for competition or success in meeting their goals.  So, it’s useful to read from a personal perspective but it’s also a very interesting viewpoint on how to coach or train someone.

***

And who is Frank Dick?

Frank Dick OBE is currently the President of the European Athletics Coaches Association and Chairman of the International Association of Athletics Federations Academy.  He is a former international athlete and was the Director of Coaching for British Athletics from 1979 to 1994.  During this time, he was the the chief coach to the British Olympic team at four Olympic Games, eight European Cups, three European Championships and four World Championships.

***

What sort of things does Frank cover in his book?

Well, the book is divided into seven parts, all delivered in Frank’s very chatty style (he is apparently a very talented speaker if you ever get the chance to hear him present).

  1. The Game – in this chapter, Frank explains that the most important thing to understand about competition and making progress is that things are always changing.  The other competitors are always improving, doing different things and using different tactics.  The conditions are always changing.  Sometimes the rules of the game even change.  Frank believes that the correct response to this realisation is to identify those things that are fixed (and work based on them being fixed) and those things that are variable (and work assuming that they can either be changed or might change on their own).  For Frank, this includes identifying which aspects of yourself or an athlete are fixed – who is the real person at the core?  What are their strengths?  Having worked that out, what then can change or needs to change?
  2. The Athlete – in this chapter, Frank explains that there are three things that allow an athlete to win or succeed at their goals.  First, they must want to win or succeed.  Second, they must believe they can win or succeed.  Third, they must persist until they win or succeed.  Interestingly, there is very little discussion of natural ability or talent.  In Frank’s opinion, desire, belief and persistence are much more important.  He quotes Calvin Coolidge, saying “Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence.  Talent will not.  Nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent.  Genius will not.  Unrewarded genius is almost a proverb.  Education will not.  The world is full of educated derelicts.  Peristence and determination alone are omnipotent.”
  3. The Team – Frank explains why it is important to make sure that where a group of people are working towards a common goal, that everyone feels that their role is critical to the achievement of that goal.
  4. The Coach – Frank takes a moment to explain the different systems of coaching, including the escort method, the transfer method and the partnership method.  He also explains the different styles, including the directing style, the coaching style, the supporting style and the counselling style.  Each of these methods and styles may be appropriate at different times in an athlete’s sporting career.  At various times, they may need direction and at other times, they may be so on top of their own development that counselling is more appropriate.
  5. The Personal Preparation Plan – Frank explains how the personal preparation plan starts from a goal but allows modifications along the way.  It starts with the bigger picture and identifies through evaluation what qualities need to be addressed in order to achieve the goal.  Frank also shares a couple of key training principles for designing training programmes.  (1) Quality and quantity cannot be trained in the same session, (2) You need to programme the development of qualities so they do not interfere with each other, (3) Variety is good for motivation, (4) Watch out for cumulative adaptation if improving more than one quality at a time, (5) Focus on the fundamentals, (6) Introduce competition conditions to prepare the athlete for the real world.
  6. Taking the Lead - Frank believes strongly that interpersonal relationships are critical to taking the lead, both for maintaining a solid support network and for engaging properly with athletes.  Frank is keen to stress the importance of regeneration and believes that a social network of friends and family are important for this.
  7. The Badge – Frank believes that it’s important to know at the end of the day what it is you stand for and what it is you are trying to achieve.  Everything comes back to this point.  What is your badge?  What do you stand for?  What are you trying to do?

***

I would definitely recommend this book strongly for anyone who has stretching goals that they want to achieve or whose job it is to help other people reach challenging goals.  I can see the lessons in this book being instrumental in helping me formulate my own approach to personal training.

This entry was posted in Book reviews and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Book review: Winning, by Frank Dick

  1. Rob says:

    I met Frank Dick in my days in athletics, proper nice guy and extremely motivating. Certainly left an impression with me! His book on Periodization is aslo very good but basic and worth a fiver
    Cheers Rob

    • Awesome, Rob. That’s exactly how he comes across in the book.

      I may look into that periodisation work. I am in a funny place with periodisation at the moment as I am not entirely convinced by it (except for endurance athletes)…

  2. Rob says:

    Chris, coming from a competetive athletics background, all my programs were periodised. Sometimes with a single peak and sometimes with a double peak, dependant on indoor and outdoor champs. I think most Olympic athletes will follow periodised programs as they allow you to taper and peak for specific periods.
    I think most information regarding training has been diluted by the internet and various programs and protocols suggest that it is now nonsense – mainly to promote their training plan etc but many of them lose sight of what periodisation is and what it should be used for.
    Training different intensities etc is one thing but in my opinion periodisation is for hitting certain periods so you can peak in performance, not just to alternate training types and is probably best used for event training and not just general training.
    Olympic athletes of the past and present used and use periodisation along with olympic lifting, powerlifting, bounding and running (the basics) to become extremely powerful and explosive. Many have not used kettlebells, macebells, hammers and manual labour training and such like (which is valid for GPP etc) but generally is training for training.
    I miss the performance element from my competetive days, because I had one thing in mind – to throw farther! All the by products from training hard such as bigger muscles, less fat, strength and speed were secondary to my ultimate goal.
    Cheers
    Rob

    • Rob says:

      Well done Rob, that sounded like one big spammy sentence! I’ll get banned from TGGO before long! BTW that wasn’t meant to sound like a rant :)

      • Rob, it didn’t sound like a rant but I am not sure I understand it! As I said, I need to think long and hard about periodisation. My problem is that I see people suffering a lot of strength loss once maximum strength is put onto the back burner. Where this is peripheral to performance (i.e. endurance), I can understand it. Where it is central, I struggle.

        I guess it may come down to definitions of “periodisation” in those cases, as some people are prepared to stretch the definition quite far. I came across someone who said that if you are doing a “period” with one exercise and then switching to another (e.g. doing 1 month with RDLs then 1 month with good mornings) then you are using periodisation. I think this is taking liberties with semantics.

        I need to think more on this.

      • Rob, you are one of my gold commenters! Why would I ban you?